Tuesday, 19 June 2007

News and Norway and "the new concept"

It is with great glee I register the development of this blog. I have earlier discussed it with Ted, and he's right, it's bollocks except for my posts. What Nat and Ted seem to have discussed is also close to the truth I believe, besides also close to what Ted and I agreed, to some extent, on. In any case, moving the general scope of the blog from self-indulgent boasting to somewhat more serious matters would be interesting. But Moses aptly objected that we should still include updates on our lives, an objection with which I most sincerely concur. Hence:

My life sucks, I had a free day today and my mum managed to call in the electrician. That meant I had to get up at 10.00. As revenge I slept until 15.30 after he left, and keenly got up for breakfast, or dinner as the mortals named it. Tomorrow work awaits once again, I can't wait. Beep, beep, beep, bag? receit? have a nice day! ....bitch. Yes I work as a cashier. That's all really, apart from that I occasionally try sorting out my life, but generally hit the wall quite fast...

That's it for my life. Today, another reiteration of why Norway rocks so much became familiar to me, do click here. Once again Norway is owning. Even if that's old news, I must say that it does quite effectively rebuke anything anyone ever might boast about their own country being excellent. Except if you're from Luxembourg. They are actually a bit richer than us. Sparsely populated assholes. Moreover I suppose our ownage is the reason for Ted's shot-in-the-dark comment of Norway being Sweden. You wish. You aren't even second on this stupid index. Finland, your OTHER neighbour owned you TOO. Sweden? Dritten i midten. The shit in the middle. Loser country with loser people in a loser culture. Bollocks to you and your wish to be like us; best.

Apart from that, nothing is happening. Norway is as silent as a dormant Portuguese the day after a rave. In these times you might actually expect to log onto some online paper and read "Sorry, there is nothing new today" or "Too bad mofo, no news."

In conclusion I can only say I like the idea. Not that I'll have to change anyway, seeing that I am the only excellent contributor here, while you others are all feeble mortals with no future whatsoever. Especially Ted, cos he's Swedish. Lisa has yet to criticise Norway, so I assume she is either an intelligent Swede (oxymoron) or has realised that she can never become what we are and that she is inferior on all points. If the latter is true, it doesn't matter that she's inferior, she's at least not COMPLETELY ignorant.

Anyway. I must say my interests of news rather span from UK, Portugal to some extent and Israel. UK because we never get much coverage on that here apart from typical "A Tory spat on the ground in London now he faces deportation to Australia. Again." Portugal I never hear about, but I suspect that's because nothing happens there just like here, so that justifies the earlier reservation in my statement. However, if there is actually something going on, possibly EU-related, I would enjoy enlightenment. Some might ask why on earth I want to hear of Israel, as there is basically nothing else coming to me through any media anywhere about this and that, but I would like to know more detailed and possibly analytically about the Palestinian situation and how Israel is dealing with it specifically. Here most people are all "ah cute Palestine help them from horrible big Israel" and I can't really have it. After what the Palestinians seem to have stirred up lately, killing each other instead of Jews, I start to wonder if they even want to attain anything by war, or if war is the actual goal. Should the latter be true, they are one clever people, should it be false they must be stupid as logs. In any case they would be classified as people I don't like, i.e. hate, so fuck them. Tell me about what you are going to do about it. Is there going to be an offensive for example, from the north of the Gaza strip? And then what?

Pakistan interests me too. There are so many of you around me all the time anyway that I have to be interested; it would be like not greeting my mum upon homecoming, not caring about Pakistan. Besides, you scored pretty shitly on the ranking presented above. Of course I could conclude that you just inherently suck, and having met you Faaez, that isn't so hard, but then again, having met you Faaez, you might also be able to shed light upon just why you are so shit?

To be quite frank I don't really worry much about Hong Kong. I don't want to know what I don't know, besides, what I'll need to know I'll probably pick up whenever I visit it. It's fine. Uruguay; I don't think much happens there either and whatever happens I will know whenever I drop by. It's fine too.

However, SWEDEN is a country that I don't only don't give a shit about, I care so little that the only news I want from there is if it's going really bad. You got an epidemic? Great, let me know.
Someone attacking you? Who? When? Are you losing the battle? Economic break down? Don't come crying to us motherfuckers, we left you more than a hundred years ago and aren't about to have make-up sex yet, bitches. In summary, if Sweden stops existing, I want to know. If not, I'll just pretend it doesn't exist anyway.

Lots of love for everyone except anyone that would consider Pärsson or Syrén valid names. You even use hitlerletters you whores.

3 comments:

Jon said...

That site is so blatantly wrong. For one, Pakistan is below North Korea. Faaez, defend me. And secondly, the UK rates more poorly than the US. By all counts of everything imaginable that is positive, the UK beats the US (except perhaps landmass, or sheer mass in general, they're quite large).

Hence, the site you linked to is obviously something you made to make yourself look cool and your penis-shaped country look larger. Close but no cigar.

In closing, http://www.england-rocks.co.uk

Thank you

Faaez said...

Lol sorry, I'd missed this post earlier.

Yes, as Jon says, this ranking is bullshit. It created an uproar when it came out and it turns out they use very shady indicators. I don't know the exact figure, but Pakistan moved 30 or some places up the list from the year before. The reason? It's frequent occuring in humanitarian-related news due to the 2005 earthquake(Yes they use that as an indicator). Solely. How absolutely inane is that?

Not that Pakistan is any Norway or anything, but still, I think you get my point.

Faaez said...

Here, this might help:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4964934.stm